California's SB-327 for IoT Security: Who is Protected and Who is Responsible?
Who does California's SB-327 for IoT security aim to protect and who bears the responsibility?
Which of the following statements accurately describes the intention of California's SB-327 for IoT security and the corresponding responsibility?
a. California's SB-327 for IoT security helps to protect companies; the responsibility lies with internet service providers.
b. California's SB-327 for IoT security helps to protect consumers; the responsibility lies with internet service providers.
c. California's SB-327 for IoT security helps to protect consumers; the responsibility lies with makers of devices that connect with the internet.
d. California's SB-327 for IoT security helps to protect consumers; the responsibility lies with companies who provide internet security software.
Final Answer:
California's SB-327 for IoT security is designed to protect consumers, with device manufacturers bearing the responsibility to implement reasonable security features.
California's SB-327 for IoT security aims to protect consumers by ensuring that the makers of devices that connect to the internet follow specific security requirements. The law requires that these device manufacturers incorporate reasonable security features appropriate to the nature and function of the device, as well as the information it may collect, contain, or transmit. This legislation does not place responsibility on internet service providers or companies that provide internet security software but directly on the device manufacturers themselves. These requirements are critical in protecting consumer information from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure.